Chelsea were held to a goalless draw at Stamford Bridge in Thomas Tuchel's first match as the successor to Frank Lampard. The German's appointment had been confirmed on Tuesday, following Lampard's dismissal on Monday, meaning he oversaw only one training session with his new players before the occasion of their first match. Rui Patrício produced saves to deny both Antonio Rüdiger and Callum Hudson-Odoi, but Chelsea otherwise largely offered too little attacking threat against opponents who defended well. "We will build a team that nobody wants to play against," Tuchel said. "I'm used to creating the special energy and atmosphere you need to create the possibility to win every three days in a league like this. I don't see too many weaknesses. I will focus on our strengths; the mix is amazing of the team between experienced players, big personalities and young, hungry talent. I was very happy performance-wise, unfortunately we couldn't score, if we take care of our performance like this the results will come." His opposite number, Nuno Espírito Santo, said: "We had a game plan, we stuck to it and we came out of it with a good point."
Starting line-ups
Chelsea
Wolves
Match Stats
ChelseaWolves
13
/
4
SHOTS / ON TARGET
6
/
0
74
%
Possession
26
%
25
Attacks into area
4
1.06
Expected goals (xG)
0.39
In possession: Chelsea
On the occasion of his first match as a manager in English football, Thomas Tuchel organised Chelsea into a 3-2-5 formation. Mateo Kovacic and Jorginho featured in central midfield, but were often joined on the same line by Callum Hudson-Odoi and Ben Chilwell if they withdrew into a deeper position. Wolves defended with a 5-2-3.
The visitors were largely passive, because they were attempting to limit the spaces Chelsea sought by defending only in their defensive half. When Chelsea were in possession Kovacic and Jorginho adopted narrow positions to offer improved defensive security and to draw Adama Traoré and Pedro Neto infield, giving César Azpilicueta and Antonio Rüdiger improved access to the half-spaces in front of them and, with Hudson-Odoi and Chilwell often further forwards, encouraging them to advance with the ball.
Chelsea dominated possession throughout, and sought to break down Wolves' organised and compact defensive block by creating an overload against Rúben Neves and Leander Dendoncker, Wolves' two central midfielders, via Kai Havertz and Hakim Ziyech working with Jorginho and Kovacic. If Havertz combined with Jorginho and Kovacic in a central position, Ziyech adopted a position in the far half-space, from where he would progress their attack; if Havertz instead moved into the relevant half-space, Ziyech combined with Jorginho and Kovacic.
When either moved into the half-spaces, Wolves' wing-backs were drawn towards them, creating the increased space Chelsea wanted to exploit via the relationship between the relevant attacking midfielder and wing-back. Between them they combined effectively, usually via a wall pass into the space in behind, followed by the delivery of a cross into the penalty area – if low, those crosses posed a threat, but those with height were comfortably defended against by Wolves' defence and their goalkeeper Rui Patrício. When one of Chelsea's wider central defenders advanced far enough to eliminate Neto or Traoré there existed the potential to create a three-on-two in those same wide areas, but they were reluctant to repeatedly do so, owing to Wolves' potential on the counter.
Wolves later adopted a flatter 5-4-1 that gave them increased cover of the width of the pitch and made them more capable of screening Chelsea's attacking midfielders, and as a consequence Chelsea offered reduced movement and a limited threat between the lines and in behind. Mason Mount and Christian Pulisic, introduced as substitutes, increased their creativity; they sought to operate towards the right, and were more effective in limited spaces than had been Ziyech and Chilwell.
A further substitute, Tammy Abraham, offered more of a threat in behind than Olivier Giroud, who he replaced, but he played too few minutes. Wolves continued to impressively defend the spaces in behind; their organisation ensured the clean sheet they earned as much of a lack of creativity from Chelsea, who showed promise in the defensive and midfield thirds but needed to improve further forwards.
In pictures
Chelsea used a 3-2-5 in possession with César Azpilicueta, Thiago Silva and Antonio Rüdiger forming their back three, behind Jorginho and Mateo Kovacic
Chelsea used a 5-2-3 when out of possession, via wing-backs Callum Hudson-Odoi and Ben Chilwell dropping back into their defensive line from alongside Hakim Ziyech, Olivier Giroud and Kai Havertz
With a back three and Jorginho and Kovacic playing centrally, Wolves’ front line became narrow to stop passes into midfield; Chelsea's wider central defenders, in turn, could step out with possession
The positioning of Havertz and Ziyech in the half-spaces enticed Wolves’ central defenders towards them, creating a slightly larger gap in Wolves’ defensive line, which Chelsea often targeted
Wolves used a 3-4-3 formation when in possession; Nélson Semedo, Leander Dendoncker, Rúben Neves and Rayan Aït-Nouri featured across midfield
They also used used a 5-2-3 out of possession, via Semedo and Aït-Nouri dropping in alongside central defenders Willy Boly, Conor Coady and Max Kilman
Largely because they struggled for possession, Wolves created their best chances in transitional moments and used the dribbling qualities of their front three to generate them
Wolves later moved to a flatter 5-4-1 out of possession in order to provide better coverage of the width of the pitch and more effectively screen Chelsea’s attacking midfielders
In possession: Wolves
Wolves manager Nuno Espírito Santo set his team up into a 3-4-3 formation in which Leander Dendoncker and Rúben Neves featured in central midfield, between Nélson Semedo and Rayan Aït-Nouri. Chelsea defended with a 5-2-3, via Ben Chilwell and Callum Hudson-Odoi withdrawing into their defensive line, but similarly to their in-possession approach, their shape also often became a 3-4-2-1.
The visitors regularly sought to play directly from Rui Patrício, but they often struggled to control the first and second ball – the second, largely because of a lack of support around the first. When they instead played short, Chelsea attempted to apply an aggressive high press intended to limit their space and to force errors.
Kai Havertz and Hakim Ziyech initially pressed Willy Boly and Max Kilman, Wolves' wider central defenders. Chelsea's ballside central midfielder took his direct opponent, and then Havertz or Ziyech withdrew to prioritise the other central midfielder to free up whichever of Jorginho or Mateo Kovacic remained unoccupied to instead protect the defensive line behind them. When the ballside wing-back pressed his direct opponent, the furthest wing-back moved to join that defensive line; César Azpilicueta and Antonio Rüdiger prioritised Pedro Neto and Adama Traoré, and moved with them if they sought to contribute in midfield.
Applying that press forced Wolves into the wide areas of the pitch, where Chelsea's intensity would increase in an attempt to force longer passes and mistakes. Wolves struggled to create established periods of possession, and therefore increasingly had to rely on moments of transition to generate goalscoring chances; when they did so, the dribbling and one-on-one abilities of their front three offered the most potential, and most often led to them being able to deliver crosses. That that was the case meant Chelsea committing fouls, and Wolves having opportunities at set-pieces, which also offered potential.
Thomas Tuchel's new team also applied a ball-oriented counter-press – particularly during the first half. Those closest to the ball during moments of transition sought to the surround the in-possession opponent and to force a mistake or turnover as early as possible and, if they did and a regain was made, another attack took place. That counter-press reduced in intensity as the evening progressed.
Our website uses cookies to distinguish you from other users of our website. This helps us to provide you with a good experience when you browse our website and also allows us to improve our site.
A cookie is a small file of letters and numbers that we store on your browser or the hard drive of your computer if you agree. Cookies contain information that is transferred to your computer's hard drive.
Strictly Necessary Cookies
These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.
If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.
Performance cookies
These allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works, for example, by ensuring that users are finding what they are looking for easily.
Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!
Additional Cookies
This website uses the following additional cookies:
Cookie
Purpose
More information
join-mailing-list
WordPress sets this cookie when you load any page, We will hide newsletter form after click on close button and it will not show again on any page.
Cookie Value: 1
Expiry time: 1 week
gated-list_
WordPress sets this cookie when you load an article page, We will hide contact form after you click on the close button and it will not show again on the particular article page.
Cookie Value: dynamic cookie value generated here
Expiry time: 1 week
wordpress_test_cookie
WordPress sets this cookie when you navigate to the login page. The cookie is used to check whether your web browser is set to allow, or reject cookies.
WordPress also sets a few wp-settings-[UID] cookies. The number on the end is your individual user ID from the users database table. This is used to customise your view of admin interface and in some circumstances the main site interface.
Cookie Value: Text indicating your preferred settings
Expiry time: session
wp-settings-time-1
WordPress also sets a few wp-settings-[UID] cookies. The number on the end is your individual user ID from the users database table. This is used to customise your view of admin interface and in some circumstances the main site interface.
Cookie Value: Text indicating your preferred settings
Expiry time: session
wordpress_logged_in_xxxxx
WordPress uses this cookie to indicate when you’re logged in, and who you are, for most interface use.
Cookie Value: Your login details in an encrypted form
Expiry time: session
wordpress_xxxxx
WordPress uses these cookies to store your authentication details, and their use is limited to the admin console area.
Cookie Value: Your login authentication details in an encrypted form
Expiry time: session
Please note that third parties (including, for example, advertising networks and providers of external services like web traffic analysis services) may also use cookies, over which we have no control. These cookies are likely to be analytical/performance cookies or targeting cookies.
You can block cookies by activating the setting on your browser that allows you to refuse the setting of all or some cookies. However, if you use your browser settings to block all cookies (including essential cookies) you may not be able to access all or parts of our site.
Except for essential cookies, all cookies will expire after the expiry periods stated in the table above.
Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!