Chelsea’s late rush towards a top-four finish suffered a setback in this 1-1 home draw with Huddersfield, but it was the visitors who stole the headlines by earning the point that guaranteed their Premier League survival. A matter of days after securing a 0-0 draw with champions Manchester City, David Wagner’s men arrived at Stamford Bridge determined to frustrate a team that lined up without either Eden Hazard or the in-form Olivier Giroud. The Terriers threatened to pull off an almost unthinkable win when Laurent Depoitre got the better of Willy Caballero and slotted home early in the second half, but Antonio Conte called for the cavalry and the equaliser came from a fortunate deflection off the face of Marcos Alonso. Here, our experts give their verdict on all the action.
Starting line-ups
Chelsea
Huddersfield
Match Stats
ChelseaHuddersfield
21
/
7
SHOTS / ON TARGET
3
/
2
880/768
Passes / Accurate
274/179
7 / 0 / 0
Fouls / Yellow / Red
10 / 1 / 0
Analysis: Chelsea
Chelsea started off in their usual 3-4-3 formation. Wing-backs Marcos Alonso and Davide Zappacosta provided the width, which allowed Pedro and Willian to play inside more and operate as either forwards or attacking midfielders in the half-spaces. Cesar Azpilicueta played as the highest of the three central defenders and was often utilised as an extra man in midfield.
Antonio Conte’s men concentrated the majority of their attacks down their right-hand side. There was a common pattern of Azpilicueta, Zappacosta, Cesc Fabregas and either Willian or Pedro (who often swapped sides) forming a diamond from which they would look to try to unlock the Huddersfield defence. The aim was often to free up either Fabregas or Azpilicueta to cross from deep, for Morata or supporting runners – most commonly Alonso – to attack from deep.
They struggled to break Huddersfield down, however, and going a goal behind forced Conte into action. The introduction of Olivier Giroud for Zappacosta pinned the individuals within Huddersfield’s last line of defence and created more space out wide. Azpilicueta moved to the right side and now provided the width as a traditional full-back in a very attacking 4-2-4 formation. Morata and Giroud occupied the three central defenders, while Willian and Pedro (and later Eden Hazard) tended to stay inside the central defenders and full-backs. This gave Azpilicueta and Alonso freedom to create opportunities from wide areas.
This was, however, not a rigid structure – and Alonso was particularly good at adapting his position in response to the movements of Pedro, Willian and Hazard. If they drifted wide, then Alonso would move inside and occasionally found himself in central attacking areas as a result. His goal, albeit a fortunate deflection, came as a direct result of this positional movement.
A late tactic from Chelsea was for the players occupying the outside central defenders and full-backs to drop deeper to receive the ball and drag the defender with them. This would create space in behind for their ball-players to find, but their passing lacked quality and they struggled to make any genuine late chances.
In pictures
Chelsea set up in a 3-4-3 formation, with wing-backs Marcos Alonso and Davide Zappacosta providing the width. Cesar Azpilicueta would often move forward from the back three to create overloads on the right-hand side of the Chelsea midfield, where most of their attacks were created.
The diamond pictured here was a common theme throughout the game, although the personnel would occasionally change. This was done to create overloads on the right and create space on the opposite side of the pitch for Alonso to attack.
Alonso would often find himself in more central areas when Willian or later Hazard drifted out wide. It was no accident that he was almost on the penalty spot when he scored; he could have had more goals from similar positions in this game.
After going a goal down, Chelsea switched to a 4-2-4 formation. This pinned the Huddersfield defensive line back and created space for Azpilicueta and Alonso – now in more traditional full-back roles – to create from wide areas.
The attacking players would sometimes drop off the highest line and take defenders with them, which would open up space for other attacking runners in behind. This required clever combination play, but the technical quality was lacking.
Huddersfield set up in a 5-3-2 formation that was very compact and difficult to break down.
Their primary strategy in attack was to send the ball long to Laurent Depoitre, either to run in behind or to hold the ball up.
On the rare occasions Huddersfield did try to play through the thirds, they found themselves outnumbered due to their own hesitance to make forward runs and Chelsea’s numerical superiority. They invariably lost possession in these situations.
There were numerous occasions in the second half when Huddersfield would have all 11 men in and around their own penalty box. This was positive in terms of defending their area, but it also meant that every time they managed to clear the ball, it would come straight back.
The visitors reacted to this late on by leaving Depoitre up the pitch and attempting to get him on the ball in the far corner, where he could run the clock down.
Analysis: Huddersfield
Huddersfield set up in a 5-3-2 formation and had a very clear game plan to soak up the pressure from Chelsea and then look to build on the counter and through direct play. The two wing-backs, Chris Lowe and Tommy Smith, would deal with play in the wide areas, while the three midfielders would act as central screens.
Even when in possession, the two Huddersfield wing-backs were a little hesitant to push forward for fear of being exploited, particularly in the knowledge that a point would be sufficient to ensure their Premier League safety. Smith would occasionally get forward on the right, but Huddersfield maintained defensive security with their three centre-backs staying compact and deep in order to deal with any threat on the counter. Aaron Mooy and Philip Billing provided excellent defensive screens in the midfield block, and worked incredibly hard to cover the ground and regain second balls.
Huddersfield only attempted to play short from goal-kicks once, and that was to entice the press from Chelsea so the long ball to Laurent Depoitre would have a better chance of creating an advantage through second balls. Almost every other attack from the visitors was a direct pass to Depoitre, who got through an exceptional amount of work to win the first ball and hold it up for his teammates.
David Wagner’s team tried on one occasion to build an attack through short passing, but because of their unwillingness to commit numbers forward they had no chance of penetrating Chelsea’s numerical superiority in midfield.
There were occasions in the final 10 minutes when all 11 Huddersfield players were in their own penalty area, Depoitre demonstrating his aerial prowess to help his team out on a number of occasions. The issue here was that the ball was inevitably cleared to Chelsea players, for the onslaught to continue. Late on, they kept Depoitre high and looked to send the ball into the corners for him to hold up and perhaps draw fouls. With the number of Huddersfield players in the box, this made it very difficult for Chelsea to create any clear-cut opportunities; the away team defended valiantly until the final whistle, when they were able to celebrate earning themselves another season in the top flight.
Key points
Chelsea looked to operate down their right-hand side as much as possible, the quartet of Cesar Azpilicueta, Cesc Fabregas, Davide Zappacosta and Willian or Pedro used mainly to construct their attacks.
Huddersfield were extremely organised in their 5-3-2 formation. David Wagner had his players working with outstanding intensity throughout.
The visitors’ primary strategy in attack was to send the ball directly to Laurent Depoitre, who was very good at winning the first ball. Aaron Mooy, Rajiv van la Parra and Philip Billing would try to pick up any second balls.
Once Chelsea went a goal down, Antonio Conte’s switch to 4-2-4 and the intelligence of Marcos Alonso in attacking areas caused Huddersfield problems – and created more space for the hosts to build more threatening attacks.
Our website uses cookies to distinguish you from other users of our website. This helps us to provide you with a good experience when you browse our website and also allows us to improve our site.
A cookie is a small file of letters and numbers that we store on your browser or the hard drive of your computer if you agree. Cookies contain information that is transferred to your computer's hard drive.
Strictly Necessary Cookies
These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.
If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.
Performance cookies
These allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works, for example, by ensuring that users are finding what they are looking for easily.
Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!
Additional Cookies
This website uses the following additional cookies:
Cookie
Purpose
More information
join-mailing-list
WordPress sets this cookie when you load any page, We will hide newsletter form after click on close button and it will not show again on any page.
Cookie Value: 1
Expiry time: 1 week
gated-list_
WordPress sets this cookie when you load an article page, We will hide contact form after you click on the close button and it will not show again on the particular article page.
Cookie Value: dynamic cookie value generated here
Expiry time: 1 week
wordpress_test_cookie
WordPress sets this cookie when you navigate to the login page. The cookie is used to check whether your web browser is set to allow, or reject cookies.
WordPress also sets a few wp-settings-[UID] cookies. The number on the end is your individual user ID from the users database table. This is used to customise your view of admin interface and in some circumstances the main site interface.
Cookie Value: Text indicating your preferred settings
Expiry time: session
wp-settings-time-1
WordPress also sets a few wp-settings-[UID] cookies. The number on the end is your individual user ID from the users database table. This is used to customise your view of admin interface and in some circumstances the main site interface.
Cookie Value: Text indicating your preferred settings
Expiry time: session
wordpress_logged_in_xxxxx
WordPress uses this cookie to indicate when you’re logged in, and who you are, for most interface use.
Cookie Value: Your login details in an encrypted form
Expiry time: session
wordpress_xxxxx
WordPress uses these cookies to store your authentication details, and their use is limited to the admin console area.
Cookie Value: Your login authentication details in an encrypted form
Expiry time: session
Please note that third parties (including, for example, advertising networks and providers of external services like web traffic analysis services) may also use cookies, over which we have no control. These cookies are likely to be analytical/performance cookies or targeting cookies.
You can block cookies by activating the setting on your browser that allows you to refuse the setting of all or some cookies. However, if you use your browser settings to block all cookies (including essential cookies) you may not be able to access all or parts of our site.
Except for essential cookies, all cookies will expire after the expiry periods stated in the table above.
Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!