Antonio Conte and Chelsea could yet end a difficult campaign with silverware, as they set up an FA Cup final meeting with Manchester United by beating Southampton 2-0 in this semi final at Wembley Stadium. Olivier Giroud danced through the Saints defence to give Chelsea the lead at the start of the second half, before substitute Alvaro Morata combined with Cesar Azpilicueta to seal the victory as full time approached. Southampton frustrated Chelsea for large parts of the game – but, as has been their problem throughout the season, they couldn’t find the back of the net. Here, our professional coaches analyse the tactics and key moments from Chelsea’s win – and assess what went wrong for Mark Hughes and Southampton.
Starting line-ups
Chelsea
Southampton
Match Stats
ChelseaSouthampton
15
/
4
SHOTS / ON TARGET
9
/
4
564/489
Passes / Accurate
450/377
6 / 0 / 0
Fouls / Yellow / Red
15 / 4 / 0
Analysis: Chelsea
Chelsea started in a 3-4-3, with Eden Hazard and Willian playing narrow to support lone striker Olivier Giroud. Wing-backs Victor Moses and Emerson provided width in attack and defence.
From the outset, Moses and Emerson moved high in an aggressive and proactive fashion. Naturally, this forced Southampton’s own wing-backs to retreat into a defensive back five, leaving space for Chelsea’s midfield to create centrally and dominate possession.
With Chelsea’s structure assembled, they managed to create significant central overloads, as Hazard and Willian played very centrally when supporting Giroud. The attacking pair also moved towards the ball rather than looking to get in behind Southampton’s defensive line. With Cesc Fabregas and N’Golo Kante similarly centrally positioned, Chelsea had four players against Southampton’s midfield three.
This structure wasn’t without its weakness, though. There was a clear lack of penetration through Southampton’s defensive unit – with only Giroud ahead of the ball, clear openings on goal were few and far between, and Chelsea became increasingly reliant on crosses from wide areas.
Southampton defended these well, with very little falling Chelsea’s way. Chelsea did look for attacking balls over their back line – with Fabregas in particular finding good pockets of space in the final third – but, in similar fashion to their crosses, they found it difficult to create meaningful attacks.
Despite their struggles going forward, Antonio Conte’s team made the perfect start to the second half, scoring within the opening minute to break the deadlock. Hazard and Willian, in contrast to the first half, were now looking to run in behind, which created problems for Southampton – and this movement led to their first goal. Hazard beautifully controlled a lofted ball from Fabregas over his shoulder before sliding in Giroud. The striker danced his way through the congested Southampton defence and expertly tapped the ball home.
While Chelsea lost some momentum after taking the lead, as Southampton reacted well to conceding, the central defensive trio of Gary Cahill, Cesar Azpilicueta and Antonio Rudiger were effective in winning their individual duels. Charlie Austin, who hoped to threaten in the air, was kept quiet and frustrated.
Southampton made three attacking substitutions in the second half, but it was Chelsea who doubled their lead. Azpilicueta moved forward from defence to support the central midfielders, who had now lost their overload, as Chelsea’s attackers ran in behind. From a carefully guided cross, substitute Alvaro Morata smartly headed Chelsea into a 2-0 lead and sealed an FA Cup final meeting with Manchester United.
In pictures
Chelsea set up in a 3-4-3 formation. Wing-backs Victor Moses and Emerson provided height when attacking and dropped into a back five when defending.
To get Cesc Fabregas on the ball more, Cesar Azpilicueta moved higher out of the back three and N’Golo Kante moved wider. The two Southampton strikers latched on to Azpilicueta and Kante, leaving Fabregas free to collect and find passes.
As Chelsea increased the pressure and Southampton dropped deeper, Fabregas found space to receive much higher up the pitch. Now Chelsea could penetrate with balls for Olivier Giroud to attack inside the Southampton penalty area.
Similar to Giroud’s movements in the first half, Eden Hazard and Willian provided more direct attacking runs in the second. Fabregas continued to find the forward runners with precise balls over the Southampton defence.
As Southampton increased the pressure, Chelsea’s back line became more proactive in possession. Azpilicueta moved higher to provide crosses for Alvaro Morata, who had just replaced Giroud as the central striker, to attack.
Southampton set up with 3-5-2 formation. The wing-backs, Ryan Bertrand and Cedric Soares, looked to support in attack, providing width and crosses for Shane Long and Charlie Austin. As with Chelsea, the pair would recover into a back five structure.
The central midfielders struggled to sustain long periods of possession, as Chelsea overloaded the central areas. Southampton resorted to meaningless possession across their back line as a result, with minimal forward penetration.
During the second half, Southampton’s central midfielders moved much higher. By positioning themselves away from Chelsea’s forward line, Southampton now had players higher up the pitch and in between Chelsea’s defensive lines.
Southampton’s centre-backs were also much more proactive in the second half. Wesley Hoedt in particular drove out of defence and looked for the highest available pass, splitting Chelsea’s midfield unit.
With Manolo Gabbiadini coming on as an extra striker, Southampton progressively built longer and longer. Both Gabbiadini and Austin caused problems with flick-ons, but they lacked supporting runners from midfield to pose any real threat.
Analysis: Southampton
Southampton began in a 3-5-2 structure. Charlie Austin and Shane Long started as two central strikers, with wing-backs Ryan Bertrand and Cedric Soares, as with Victor Moses and Emerson for Chelsea, providing width in attack and defence.
Southampton struggled to protect the ball in the early stages of the game, and consequently couldn’t put together large sequences of passes. They used long balls from deep early on to test the resolve of Chelsea’s defensive unit – but these were largely a waste and often handed Chelsea possession back.
While Southampton were very much in the game as Chelsea struggled to break the deadlock, Oriol Romeu and Pierre-Emile Hojbjerg, who looked to orchestrate the build-up from midfield, struggled to overcome Chelsea’s central overload.
As a result, they again resorted to longer balls in to Charlie Austin when they might have been better to utilise the wide areas. With Southampton’s midfielders becoming frustrated, they kept possession safe and secure, with minimal penetrative forward passes. While they saw plenty of the ball, their possession was meaningless, as they aimlessly switched along the back line from one side to the other.
Southampton would nonetheless have been pleased to go into the break goalless – making their start to the second half all the more frustrating. The Saints went 1-0 down within the first minute, as they struggled to handle Chelsea’s forward runners and couldn’t stop Olivier Giroud from dribbling past multiple defenders to tap home.
Conceding did, however, force them into lifting their momentum. Hojbjerg and Mario Lemina began to move ahead of the ball, and crucially positioned themselves in between Chelsea’s defensive lines. With Eden Hazard and Willian now moving in behind, Chelsea’s central overload was less effective – especially when Southampton quickly transitioned into attack after regaining possession.
Attacking substitutes Manolo Gabbiadini and Nathan Redmond brought encouraging signs to Southampton’s attacking play. Their passes became sharper and quicker, and moves often finished with an end product on goal. Their general play became more direct, with Wesley Hoedt in particular driving forward out of defence. He frequently looked for the highest available pass, which split Chelsea’s midfield unit and created further chances.
Once Chelsea scored their second late on, however, Southampton’s hopes of an FA Cup final appearance faded. They could hope only for a consolation goal in the few minutes remaining, which wasn't forthcoming, as Chelsea secured a 2-0 victory.
Key points
Chelsea’s central overload was key. With attacking midfielders Eden Hazard and Willian playing inside, wing-backs Victor Moses and Emerson could overlap and create attacking width. Along with Giroud as the central striker, the wing-backs pinned back Southampton’s back line, leaving them disconnected from their central midfield.
Willian and Hazard dropped short to accompany N’Golo Kante and Cesc Fabregas in central areas. This created an overload of four on three against Southampton’s midfield trio. Despite this, Chelsea struggled to penetrate due to a lack of numbers either in the box or simply ahead of the ball. Fabregas did manage to find some advanced pockets of space, but Chelsea still lacked a clear-cut chance to score.
As Willian and Hazard began to run ahead of the ball in the second half, Chelsea began to lose their central overload. But with this, they penetrated much more, and Hazard's desire to run beyond led to their opening goal. These movements stretched Southampton’s back line, and Olivier Giroud capitalised by finding the space to score the opening goal.
Our website uses cookies to distinguish you from other users of our website. This helps us to provide you with a good experience when you browse our website and also allows us to improve our site.
A cookie is a small file of letters and numbers that we store on your browser or the hard drive of your computer if you agree. Cookies contain information that is transferred to your computer's hard drive.
Strictly Necessary Cookies
These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.
If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.
Performance cookies
These allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works, for example, by ensuring that users are finding what they are looking for easily.
Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!
Additional Cookies
This website uses the following additional cookies:
Cookie
Purpose
More information
join-mailing-list
WordPress sets this cookie when you load any page, We will hide newsletter form after click on close button and it will not show again on any page.
Cookie Value: 1
Expiry time: 1 week
gated-list_
WordPress sets this cookie when you load an article page, We will hide contact form after you click on the close button and it will not show again on the particular article page.
Cookie Value: dynamic cookie value generated here
Expiry time: 1 week
wordpress_test_cookie
WordPress sets this cookie when you navigate to the login page. The cookie is used to check whether your web browser is set to allow, or reject cookies.
WordPress also sets a few wp-settings-[UID] cookies. The number on the end is your individual user ID from the users database table. This is used to customise your view of admin interface and in some circumstances the main site interface.
Cookie Value: Text indicating your preferred settings
Expiry time: session
wp-settings-time-1
WordPress also sets a few wp-settings-[UID] cookies. The number on the end is your individual user ID from the users database table. This is used to customise your view of admin interface and in some circumstances the main site interface.
Cookie Value: Text indicating your preferred settings
Expiry time: session
wordpress_logged_in_xxxxx
WordPress uses this cookie to indicate when you’re logged in, and who you are, for most interface use.
Cookie Value: Your login details in an encrypted form
Expiry time: session
wordpress_xxxxx
WordPress uses these cookies to store your authentication details, and their use is limited to the admin console area.
Cookie Value: Your login authentication details in an encrypted form
Expiry time: session
Please note that third parties (including, for example, advertising networks and providers of external services like web traffic analysis services) may also use cookies, over which we have no control. These cookies are likely to be analytical/performance cookies or targeting cookies.
You can block cookies by activating the setting on your browser that allows you to refuse the setting of all or some cookies. However, if you use your browser settings to block all cookies (including essential cookies) you may not be able to access all or parts of our site.
Except for essential cookies, all cookies will expire after the expiry periods stated in the table above.
Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!