Manchester United kept their top-four hopes alive with a hard-fought victory over an impressive West Ham at Old Trafford. Ole Gunnar Solskjaer’s team had fallen at home to Barcelona in the Champions League only three days before, but they earned an early lead when Paul Pogba converted from the spot after Juan Mata had been fouled in the West Ham area. The visitors were the better team for long periods, however, and found a deserved equaliser when Manuel Lanzini crossed for Felipe Anderson to finish past David de Gea early in the second half. The Hammers pushed for all three points, but left themselves open to the counter-attack – and it was from one such move that Anthony Martial drew the foul that gifted Pogba a second spot-kick of the match. The Frenchman finished confidently to win his team a crucial three points in the battle for the Champions League places, while West Ham remain just outside the top half.
Starting line-ups
Manchester United
West Ham
Match Stats
Manchester UnitedWest Ham
14
/
4
SHOTS / ON TARGET
15
/
5
393/316
Passes / Accurate
551/460
14 / 1 / 0
Fouls / Yellow / Red
5 / 1 / 0
Analysis: Manchester United
Ole Gunnar Solskjaer set Manchester United up in a 4-2-3-1 structure when in possession, with Paul Pogba and Fred as the double pivot and Juan Mata playing as a number 10 behind Romelu Lukaku. The hosts targeted quick central transitions in the opening exchanges, with Jesse Lingard drifting inside from his starting position on the right.
As West Ham targeted the wide areas in possession, United often found themselves able to drive forward through the central lane after a regain. With Lingard moving infield, right-back Diogo Dalot pushed higher to provide crossing opportunities; Anthony Martial did likewise on the left.
The hosts took the lead through a Pogba penalty after Mata was adjudged to have been fouled in the Hammers’ box, after which the visitors dropped deeper to lessen the United threat on the counter. The hosts enjoyed longer spells in possession as a result, but at a slower tempo – and as the half wore on West Ham took a more proactive attacking approach that forced United to drop men behind the ball. This naturally reduced the quality of their attacking transitions.
Ole Gunnar Solskjaer turned to Marcus Rashford early in the second half, with West Ham’s dominance in possession still forcing United to attack only on the counter. Rashford’s movements to receive in behind gave the hosts much more penetrative potential, and as the visitors went after the win United enjoyed much more threat during moments of transition. It was from one lightning break that Martial drew the foul that earned the hosts their second penalty of the game; Pogba duly stepped up to power home the winner.
Out of possession, United utilised a narrow 4-3-3 mid-block. The midfield trio of Fred, Pogba and Mata remained very narrow, which protected central areas but gave West Ham’s wingers more time and space on the ball out wide. To counter this, and with the visitors’ full-backs also pushing forward, United dropped into more of a 4-4-1-1 shape, with Martial and Lingard dropping back into wide areas outside Fred and Pogba. This did give the hosts a chance to get in behind the West Ham full-backs in transition, but with their wide attackers now deeper it required Lukaku to make those runs – and that inevitably meant less of a central presence for any subsequent balls in.
Having conceded early in the second half, United continued to struggle with the attacking width provided by West Ham’s wingers. This stretched the home midfield and left Fred and Pogba vulnerable against runners from deep. After the introduction of Rashford, however, United reverted to their original 4-3-3 shape off the ball but left the front line higher. This forced the West Ham full-backs deeper, which in turn reduced the visitors’ threat as United held out for a crucial three points.
In pictures
West Ham’s commitment to attacking in wide areas gave Manchester United the chance to attack the central lane in transition. Jesse Lingard’s movements inside, from his starting position on the right in a 4-2-3-1 formation, added extra central threat.
The hosts initially set up in a narrow 4-3-3 defensive shape, but responded to the visitors’ threat in wide areas – from both wide attackers and full-backs – by dropping Lingard and Anthony Martial into a 4-4-1-1 mid-block.
The second-half introduction of Marcus Rashford gave the hosts more penetrative movements, as his direct runs created more moments to attack the spaces in behind the West Ham defence.
West Ham set up in a 4-3-3 formation, with their combinations in wide areas dragging the Manchester United defence out of shape and creating space for their numerous runners from midfield. However, this left single pivot Declan Rice isolated in blocking off the entire central lane behind them.
The visitors eventually dropped into a 4-1-4-1 mid-block out of possession, nullifying any central transitional play from the hosts, yet still having players high to press the ball.
The quality and width of Felipe Anderson and Manuel Lanzini, with support from one of Robert Snodgrass or Mark Noble in the second period, meant West Ham could keep more players behind the ball when attacking.
Analysis: West Ham
Manuel Pellegrini set West Ham up in an attacking 4-3-3 formation, with Declan Rice sitting behind Mark Noble and Robert Snodgrass in midfield. Felipe Anderson and Manuel Lanzini supported Javier Hernandez in attack, and enjoyed plenty of early success against Manchester United’s narrow midfield – Anderson was unlucky to see his early goal ruled out for offside.
The inclusion of Snodgrass in midfield enhanced the visitors’ crossing play, as his wider position as a central midfielder helped create overloads against the United full-backs. Should either a central midfielder or wide midfielder come across to help, West Ham then pushed their full-backs forward to maintain the overload. The visitors also had plenty of runners into the penalty area, as Chris Smalling and Phil Jones came under some pressure at the heart of the United defence.
Having gone a goal down to Paul Pogba’s first penalty of the game, the Hammers pushed full-backs Arthur Masuaku and Pablo Zabaleta higher; Snodgrass moved into a more central number 10 position, with Noble dropping deeper to join Rice as a double pivot in a 4-2-3-1. Their continued threat from out wide eventually led to an equaliser early in the second half, as Lanzini capitalised on confusion between David de Gea and Pogba to cross for Anderson to beat the United keeper from close range.
With Lanzini and Anderson staying wide and stretching the United midfield, central runs from Snodgrass and Noble dragged the hosts’ centre-backs and double pivot out of position – but injury to Lanzini just past the hour robbed the Hammers of their main creative spark and forced them to commit more numbers forward if they were to attack with the same threat. Substitute Michail Antonio did crash an effort against the bar soon after coming on, and had a header saved superbly by David de Gea, but these misses came at a cost when United won the late penalty from which Pogba scored the winner.
Out of possession, the Hammers’ attacking approach in wide areas gave their opponents room to counter-attack in central areas. Forward runs from Noble and Snodgrass meant that Declan Rice was often left alone to screen the entire central lane; the young England international often selected to screen lone United forward Romelu Lukaku, who looked to move towards the ball as an extra passing option on the break.
Once the Hammers settle into a mid-block, their 4-1-4-1 structure nullified most of the hosts’ attacking progress – and they were unlucky to fall behind when Snodgrass was adjudged to have brought down Juan Mata for United’s opener from the penalty spot. The subsequent switch to a 4-2-3-1 worked both to push the hosts’ wide attackers deeper and close up central areas, with Noble now alongside Rice in midfield.
This structure enabled the visitors to dominate possession and rarely look troubled in defence for much of the remainder of the game. Only when Lanzini departed and they had to commit more men forward in attack did they open themselves up to being exposed in defensive transition. In the end, having conceded a second penalty, the Hammers were unlucky to lose a game in which they were the better team for long periods.
Our website uses cookies to distinguish you from other users of our website. This helps us to provide you with a good experience when you browse our website and also allows us to improve our site.
A cookie is a small file of letters and numbers that we store on your browser or the hard drive of your computer if you agree. Cookies contain information that is transferred to your computer's hard drive.
Strictly Necessary Cookies
These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.
If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.
Performance cookies
These allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works, for example, by ensuring that users are finding what they are looking for easily.
Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!
Additional Cookies
This website uses the following additional cookies:
Cookie
Purpose
More information
join-mailing-list
WordPress sets this cookie when you load any page, We will hide newsletter form after click on close button and it will not show again on any page.
Cookie Value: 1
Expiry time: 1 week
gated-list_
WordPress sets this cookie when you load an article page, We will hide contact form after you click on the close button and it will not show again on the particular article page.
Cookie Value: dynamic cookie value generated here
Expiry time: 1 week
wordpress_test_cookie
WordPress sets this cookie when you navigate to the login page. The cookie is used to check whether your web browser is set to allow, or reject cookies.
WordPress also sets a few wp-settings-[UID] cookies. The number on the end is your individual user ID from the users database table. This is used to customise your view of admin interface and in some circumstances the main site interface.
Cookie Value: Text indicating your preferred settings
Expiry time: session
wp-settings-time-1
WordPress also sets a few wp-settings-[UID] cookies. The number on the end is your individual user ID from the users database table. This is used to customise your view of admin interface and in some circumstances the main site interface.
Cookie Value: Text indicating your preferred settings
Expiry time: session
wordpress_logged_in_xxxxx
WordPress uses this cookie to indicate when you’re logged in, and who you are, for most interface use.
Cookie Value: Your login details in an encrypted form
Expiry time: session
wordpress_xxxxx
WordPress uses these cookies to store your authentication details, and their use is limited to the admin console area.
Cookie Value: Your login authentication details in an encrypted form
Expiry time: session
Please note that third parties (including, for example, advertising networks and providers of external services like web traffic analysis services) may also use cookies, over which we have no control. These cookies are likely to be analytical/performance cookies or targeting cookies.
You can block cookies by activating the setting on your browser that allows you to refuse the setting of all or some cookies. However, if you use your browser settings to block all cookies (including essential cookies) you may not be able to access all or parts of our site.
Except for essential cookies, all cookies will expire after the expiry periods stated in the table above.
Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!